Is Your Persuasion Talent Worthless?

What strikes me right away is that he talks about laws and yet gives no immediate details, but simply refers to them time and again.

He used several different techniques…or at least I hallucinated them.

He presupposed multiple times that YOU already draw.
He inserted his intentions clearly and transfered them to YOU multiple times.
He also future paced a lot.

I’m not sure if he did all of this truly intentionally or if it was just natural but either way it seemed very effective.

Jay

Those are all good – but not the one I am thinking of. The one I’m thinking of, he does on and on the whole time.

He is VERY effective. As is all of Mark Joyner’s material. I love Simpleology. And I think my son will love the drawing information.

The guy in the video is REALLY good. And I doubt it is because he has studied persuasion. Ninety some odd years will give a student of human nature some real skills though, and he sure has ’em.

Watch it again if need be.

He was speaking rythmically as he future paced in assupumtive sentences .

He teaches us, to start with the basic, put in action, keep learning more, e always alwyas put that in action.

And he also give a lot of testimonials and examples, and that establish him ( or us, because we have to take action ) as an authority!

All very good replies.

However, Hugo, you got it.

He launched into a rhythm and kept at it the whole way through.

Great job, Hugo.

Unfortunatly I am On dial up at the moment So I could not watch the vid.
I see mentions of rhythm here.
I watched some 2 or 3 Rich Bandler videos and found that the kind of rhythm he uses puts you to sleep as intended. I woke up and saw the people he was talking to in the audience on the video were also asleep.

I thought this happened just because I was tired. But after a third time watching.. I realized this guy was a genius.

I reflect on times where Priest’s used rhythm without breaking the rhythm at all. Although this eventually drew away audiences due to people’s lasting memories of being board. (You can just imagine the body’s of the crowd swaying, yawing and breathing shallow) Now they seem to use a more modern approach with less of the old school. I love this stuff..

What I want to know is what other people think here..
How many people who do this would we think are totally aware and fully planed in doing this type of talk. Compared to how many just do it without being totally clued on to what is taking place in the audience’s mind’s.

Unless a person is trained to do this, they would not be aware of it – for the most part. There are any number of answers as to how they “learned” it. A natural predisposition for rhythm, or perhaps an upbringing in a church environment where the preacher used this style. Lots of ways a person could get to this point.

People who have studied my work will absolutely be aware of this. In the first month of the Persuasion Factor we get into that topic.

Persuasion is most powerful when you combine a number of different strategies into what you are doing.

Remember too that if a person is themselves untrained in these skills and does something “naturally” they will most likely have highs and lows. Meaning when they are “on” and doing things at the top of their game, things are good. But when they veer away from it because they weren’t aware of why what they were doing was working, their results drop.

Study helps to level out the yo yo effect. (not to mention raising your income) 🙂

Thanks.
Its good to hear what you said Kenrick. It kind of answers what I see in many people.
It’s kinda bothersome at times.

He is as good as I have ever heard. Honestly, though, I did not conclude “rhythmic”, even tho I listened intently 3 times. After reading your analysis, I realized that he also continued to establish his credibility and did nothing to detract from his words by movements, clothing, etc. It was like listening to a Bach 2-part invention–the phrasing, the flow, the interweaving of his persuasive points.

WOW

Happy Thanksgiving.